|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Five launches syndicated online video player
June 16, 2009 Five is to syndicate its online video player, allowing shows to be viewed outside of the broadcaster's Demand Five catch-up service. The video player, which is based on the Brightcove platform, will initially be made available through Five's own online properties and those of approved affiliate partners. Later in 2009 users will be able to embed videos virally in to any webpage. Videos are in the form of Flash streams, supported by advertising. Although all four UK broadcasters offer free-to-view catch-up online Five is the first to syndicate its player; the BBC iPlayer, ITVPlayer and Channel 4's 4oD can only be accessed through each of the broadcasters' core sites and portals, or via specially created outlets on closed network VoD platforms.
It should be noted that Five relies very much on third party licensed content - mainly hit US TV shows - to drive its viewership, with the exception of some homegrown programming such as Fifth Gear. This naturally makes Five's ability to become a content reseller a more complex proposition, but fits very well into a syndicated video player strategy. Syndicating the video player, rather than selling or reselling the content it has rights to to third party ad-supported platforms, is likely to generate more revenue for Five than licensing content to online affiliate partners individually. Five can typically command higher CPM rates than its affiliates by maintaining control of the content and the online ad inventory available in the UK around the specific shows it holds rights to. By centralizing ad sales, Five will be able to maintain its ad rates, which would not happen in the market if multiple partner sites were competing with one another for advertisers with the same licensed content. Further, Five can retain almost 100% of its ad revenue in some cases even as it syndicates the player through third party sites, even though it will carry the cost for ad sales and video delivery. This approach is likely to be more lucrative on a per-view basis for the broadcaster than the typical 70% share of ad revenue from online episode views were it to license the programming to other platforms. Pages: 0Tables & charts: 0Tags:
.
|
|
|
Contact us |
Terms of use | Terms & Conditions |
screendigest © |
Screen Digest is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
|
||