|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Theatrical, the new day-and-date window for VoD
October 24, 2011 Universal Pictures and Warner Bros are risking the wrath of cinema operators by launching new tests of premium video-on-demand (VoD) - a new exploitiation window for movies on cable and satellite TV systems. Comcast/NBC Universal's Tower Heist was set to debut on the operator's on-demand platform a mere 21 days after its theatrical debut at $59.99 per premium on-demand rental. Plans for the early release to on-demand platforms were dropped when Cinemark, National Amusements and other exhibitors threatened to boycott the movie. Following the uproar, it is likely that the film will be released to on-demand platforms in a day-and-date with DVD scenario, 90 days from its theatrical release. Having led the way with day-and-date release to home video and on-demand services, Warner is once again testing the waters. The studio is partnering with Time Warner Cable to test the viability of early and pre-theatrical on-demand windows. Melancholia, a drama starring Kirsten Dunst, will be available one full month prior to its theatrical debut.The studio released Trespass on 14 October to both its theatrical window and VoD on TWC. Warner's third title Margin Call was released on 21 October. Premium on-demand has not been received with open arms by consumers. Earlier this year Disney's premium on-demand test in Portugal was not a success. DirecTV's offering of $30 premium VoD's 60 days after the theatrical debut has also been met with limited sales. While it makes sense that a premium on-demand rental costs the same as a night out for a family, sticker shock at the end of the month on pay TV bills is likely inhibiting adoption. Several independent studios have also experimented with early/premium on-demand windows, even going so far as to pre-release titles to on-demand prior to their theatrical run. Most recently Summit Entertainment released Source Code nearly three weeks prior to bowing on DVD. Like Summit, Lionsgate is experimenting with early on-demand windowing with its upcoming Abduction, which is slated to hit on-demand platforms 23 December, 10 days prior to its DVD/Blu-ray release. Other smaller independents have gone earlier, a handful have debuted on on-demand platforms, even prior to their theatrical runs. Several studios have expressed interest in embarking upon a reduced window for on-demand, whether it be day-and-date with theatrical, or a premium on-demand window. The collective moves are a response to declining theatrical admissions coupled with softening disc sales. At issue:
It is necessary to understand the context of the market which influenced Universal and Warner to experiment with untested windowing strategies. The moves to reduce or eliminate the theatrical window are being met with significant backlash by theater operators who feel that cutting into the theatrical window will endanger their business. On one hand, their argument makes sense, but on the other, the studios are forced to acknowledge market realities. As home video declines have whittled away at the profitability of the film business, theatrical admissions have continued to slide. Buoyed by increased ticket prices and the 3D premium, theatrical revenues have managed to rise, but we believe that this is not sustainable. Thus, the burden falls to pay TV and online on-demand, in addition to digital purchase (EST), to make up for the shortfall in home video spending. Current IHS Screen Digest modeling of the pay TV on-demand business makes the assumption that current windows will remain through 2015. If this assumption is correct, there will is no relief in sight from pay TV on-demand. While online rental/EST/subscription spending will total $746m in 2015, there is still a significant gap left by declining home video sales. As studios continue to experiment with windowing, there are bound to be significant growing pains for the industry. We believe that there will always be a demand for theatrical exhibitions as they provide an experience that cannot be matched in the living room by any size screen. However, we also believe that concurrent releases to the theatrical window and the on-demand window will likely cause friction in the near term, but serve to support growth in on-demand spending over time. Tags:
.
|
Related Data
Market summaries
Admissions and box office
|
|
Contact us |
Terms of use | Terms & Conditions |
screendigest © |
Screen Digest is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
|
||